[Hardy-l] Hardy Speaks for Hillary?

[Rosemarie Morgan]

Ah --now I understand .  I would say it's appropriate, in a purely literary 
sense,  insofar as it fits the writer's argument neatly --and there's also 
a subversive irony in the fact that, in a marginalising way,  Clinton does 
"run" as the member's wife (apologies for the lewd implications).

Cheers,
Rosemarie:
Betty thank you so much for taking the trouble to cite at such length.

>I've excerpted the relevant article from  a very long one sent by 
>Roy  (too long for our archives)  from the Campaign Standard Blog.