[Hardy-l] RE: Tess
Rosemarie Morgan
Rosemarie.morgan at yale.edu
Thu Oct 16 12:42:22 PDT 2008
>I agree with Jane on Tess's sexuality and Hardy's sensitive treatment of
>its complexity.
>And while it is well to "remember that, however moved by and drawn to
>Tess we may feel, she is a fictional construct and not a real woman"
>Hardy's readers are not fictional. "To speculate outside what is given in
>the text itself" is what readers and critics do -- text and textual
>context cannot be separated as Hardy himself recognised-- idly or not.
Rosemarie
More information about the Hardy-l
mailing list