[Hardy-l] Re: Thoughts on 'Tess'
Rosemarie Morgan
Rosemarie.morgan at yale.edu
Wed Jan 7 06:20:43 PST 2009
I agree with you, Fraser, about the Cerealia - bit of a stretch,
Marlott-by-the-sea! But then the 'startle' for the passing Clare lads was
real so perhaps a little artistic licence is justified here.
Alec, yes, lacks command & authority but since he's an upstart
(manufacturer cum landowner) he might never have possessed classy arrogance
in the first place. Even so, he certainly should be affecting it. Question:
is this a shortcoming in the actor or in the director? (Paul? )
I would disagree with you on one point. Country girls could be stunningly
beautiful with little sign of "harshness of life"-- to wit, Gertrude
Bugler. The problem lies, I think, in early photographic techniques. If you
could afford a first-class portrait photographer (see the "Ladies" --
Florence Henniker, Agnes Grove, Rosamund Tomson in Millgate's revised
biography) you could have the very best of your features enhanced and the
weakest feathered out and so on, but if you were a working girl such as
Louisa Harding, Tryphena Sparks and the Hardy sisters you might not have
this advantage (again, see Millgate for a distinct contrast in quality and
portrait styles between upper- and working-class subjects). Added to which,
it was not the fashion to smile into the camera -- which shapes our modern
sense of what glamour should be.
Cheers,
Rosemarie
>The May day dancing on the slopes above the sea, gave me a bit of a
>jolt / The actors, particularly the female ones
>- their looks, their body movements and gestures - just appear too
>modern !!!!
>
>Fraser Pakes
More information about the Hardy-l
mailing list