[hardy-l] Tess as Alec's mistress and Joan's complicity with Alec
Rosemarie Morgan
Rosemarie.morgan at yale.edu
Tue Jan 13 08:01:38 PST 2009
This is a superbly detailed profile of Joan - thank you Jane -- and I feel
, perhaps, in line, with Jane (?) that we may be too hard on Joan who is,
after all, going along with the "country code" of encouraging her daughter
to play her "trump card" (using sexual allure to gain a husband
--especially one from a higher class). Joan *does* though, underestimate
Tess's capacity to rebound (as opposed to capitulating) -- as when Alec
confronts Tess (as she leaves Trantridge) with the fact that she will never
love him and she responds to the effect that she never can, or never will,
although now would be a good time for saying she did (she, being pregnant).
Joan later admits (to Angel) that she never did really know Tess (first
edition), but -- and this is my question -- *why* does Joan tell Angel
where Tess can be found (Sandbourne)? Is this in the belief that Tess would
wish it? Or because Angel is Tess's legal husband --and should be told? Or
because she- Joan - feels guilty about the part she's played in Tess's
downfall ? (possibly all this and more) I wonder what folks think about
this -- considering that if Tess chooses to flee from Alec, as she does,
that the Durberfield family may be the losers.
Best
Rosemarie
>I have been meaning to comment on this since Joan Durbeyfield's role in
>Tess's downfall
>
>Best wishes
>Jane
More information about the Hardy-l
mailing list