[hardy-l] Tess - Angel not charged

[Charles.Anesi at wellsfargo.com]

I tend to agree that the case against Angel as an accessory after the
fact would be weak, given the problems with the elements of knowledge
and assistance that Phillip and others have noted.   When the facts are
scrutinized closely, it seems that Hardy took extraordinary pains to
keep Angel on the straight and narrow, as Keith says.  Before the
current discussion I never realized how careful Hardy was in this
respect.         
 
Chuck Anesi 
charles.anesi at wellsfargo.com <mailto:charles.anesi at wellsfargo.com>  
office 480-575-3478 
cell 612-940-3345 
fax 480-575-3519 
  
** These opinions are strictly my own and not necessarily those of Wells
Fargo ** 

This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on
this message or any information herein. If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://coyote.csusm.edu/pipermail/hardy-l/attachments/20090114/876e1aa0/attachment.html