[hardy-l] Jeffries
Rosemarie Morgan
Rosemarie.morgan at yale.edu
Tue Jan 20 14:59:54 PST 2009
I've just looked at Hardy's letters and found the following
____________________________________________
To EDWARD GARNETT MAX GATE
Dear Sir:, | DORCHESTER. | 21:11:1904
I have finished reading the book that you have been kind enough to
send me. I had not seen it before, though I recollected the title, & I
should probably never have read a line of it but for this presentation of
yours.
It is a very thorough study, on a large scale, of a farmer & his
family, & would have made a good first book of a novel as long as Tom Jones
or Clarissa. I like it exceedingly.
The question that you raise in your preface, of the relative
virtues, as fiction, of studies or sketches of character & scenery like the
present, & the same when connected by a rounded plot, or drama, that (if
perfectly constructed) is like an animal organism, & does not contain a
line which fails to help on the development -- is one of interest. I
understand you to hold that it is greater to succeed in the first kind,
without attempting the more subtle
Second, than to attempt the second & succeed but indifferently
therein outside the qualities of the first, (assuming these to be equal in
both cases.) Some might answer that this is despising in the story with a
cohering plot all that you have valued in the other, & the higher aim in
addition. Nevertheless it is the attitude of English critics in general not
to value the artistic aspect of a composition as a whole, so that you are
not singular in your doctrine.
I should add that I have not for many years looked into the novel
of mine that you name, & have no opinion for or against it.
With thanks for the book, I am
Yours truly
Thomas Hardy.
____________________________
_END____________________________
Purdy/ Millgate Notes:
Garnett: Edward Garnett (1868-1937), author and editor. the book: a
reprint of Richard Jefferies's Amaryllis at the Fair, with an introduction
by Edward Garnett (London, 1904). in your preface: Garnett, seeking to
defend Amaryllis at the Fair against the standard charge of lack of plot
structure, had argued that its very spontaneity and 'naturalness' made it
superior to Hardy's highly plotted novels, in which the 'arranging and
rearranging' activity of the author was too plainly visible. In a
subsequent letter (25 Nov 04, DCM) Garnett pointed to Sarah Orne Jewett's
The Country of the Pointed Firs and Conrad's Heart of Darkness as examples
of essentially undramatic novels that had little popular appeal and were
therefore difficult to publish. that you name: Garnett had taken The Mayor
of Casterbridge as an example of Hardy's work.
__________________________
____END ________________________
I hope this prompts some interest in Jefferies.
Best
Rosemarie
______________
END
__________________
More information about the Hardy-l
mailing list